It was the first of many Simultaneous Chess Exhibitions to be held this New Year at the Albany Academies Chess Club. Dean Howard, a local expert, honorary AA Chess Club member and long time Chess player did the honors.
Twelve of 24 Chess Club students banded together in the AA Buttery to show their quality against Mr. Dean Howard. Lining up as they did along the polished great oak tables, the uniformed students faced their nemesis with armies and armies of white pieces. Like a young tribe on the hunt and out for blood, they surrounded their quarry. Always six young warriors to the front and six at his back. Always. “Surely, one of us shall fell this man.” Or so they thought.
Dean, the top board Geezer, the great chess beast, the gargantuan elder, came at them one, by one, by one with the black pieces. The Chess Clubbers had already danced their little war dance, dressed for battle, and sang their song of defiance and victory. The time for resolve was at hand. And so they launched their spears, pebbles, rocks and arrows. The cavalry rode forth, the infantry marched, the lancers and pike advanced. But the man in the center of the assault was not fazed. He seemed to be enjoying it…
Like a rampaging elephant squashing mosquitoes into goo, the surrounded man stood victorious in the end. And from that ash heap of fallen kings he declared certain games worthy of study. Below is one of those games.
Not only Dean Howard commented this game as worthy of review, but the blunder checker software agrees that it merits review and or publication.
January 26th 2016 the Albany Academies Chess Club is proud to have Peter Henner do the honors of a Simultaneous Chess Exhibition.
Here is a free beginner chess book written by Lauren Goodkind of the Bay Area. It is a touching work and quick read. Her personal story and teaching method are worthy.
Thomas E. Clark is the Chess Tutor in Albany NY at The Albany Academies. He is the chess instructor in Schenectady NY at the Brown Private school. Tom is the chess teacher in Latham NY at the Albany Chinese School. He also tutors chess in albany NY at the summer LEAP program for kids.
The basis for building an Opening Repertoire is brutal efficiency. The problem of what needs be done is clear. You have a limited life time at your age(any age), and a limited time in any given day to devote to chess. Chess on the other hand, is seemingly infinite and will long outlast you, and any amount of study or practice. Therefore, you need to select and economize openings for White and Black that actually limit, rather than expand the volumes of work you have before you.
By example. Lets say you love the Ruy Lopez as White and begin with E4. Guess what, before Black ever allows you an entry ticket into the Spanish opening, you have to be ready to face players who will turn you down and challenge you with the Sicilian, French, Alekhine, Caro-Kann, Petrov, Center Counter and the like. As someone who wants to enjoy move 3 or 4 of the Ruy Lopez, you have an awful lot more to study before getting to your Spanish lesson.
What to do then? E4 is the most popular first move and so there are more games to comb through in the Data Bases and that much more theory to review simply because it is the most frequent beginning to a chess game. What if you are 45 years old or 55 years old and beginning your early retirement for the purpose of studying chess? You will do better, with the limited time you have, with even
slightly less frequented openings. So, at the start of your Repertoir construction, narrow your focus to become a D4, C4, Nf3 player for White. Avoid the main stream. This will still afford you such a wealth of study, that you should never get bored or feel it is too repetitive. Even playing white as a D4 player, you have to know the Queen’s Gambit Declined, QG Accepted, Dutch, KID, Budapest, Bennoni, Benko and so much more.
Congratulations, at the start of building your Opening scheme, you split the infinite game of Chess in 1/2. You then only ever play in the infinitely large 1/2 that is simply less frequented by the rest of the chess world. This means, given your time constraints, you can get a slight edge on the opponents who are likely more knowledgeable in a different area.
Brutal efficiency isn’t esthetically pretty, it is exactly as it sounds.
While building your Opening Book for Black, and you find yourself expecting E4 so you can play E5, you still have to be ready for white to come at you with Bird, D4, English, and the lot of offbeat openings like the Polish or Orangutan. If, while playing Black, you want to enter the classic territory of a Ruy Lopez game, Black must also be ready for white to play the exchange or Delayed Ruy Lopez exchange, or even the Schliemann. Only then can Black get the thrill of using the Marshall Attack or Breyer variation against the opponent.
So, what to do as Black then? Find an answer that takes care of E4, D4, NF3, C4 and the rest. Your job is to know enough about each that you can simply and elegantly answer the largest number of possibilities with a sound, but limited, and hopefully small number of replies.
It’s like most every profession these days, simplify, find your niche and specialize in something. With Chess, it will give you more than enough to enjoy for this lifetime. And you may just win a game or two along the way.
Thomas E. Clark Licensed Psychotherapist in NY and CA.
Thomas E. Clark thomas @ albany-therapy . com Licensed Psychotherapist in NY and CA is the Chess Tutor in Albany NY at The Albany Academies. He is the chess instructor in Schenectady NY at the Brown Private school. Tom is the chess teacher in Latham NY at the Albany Chinese School. He also tutors chess in albany NY at the summer LEAP program for kids and gives private lessons via his chess tutor profile on wyzant.com .
The board 1 game from last Thursday’s Schenectady A – Capital Region CDCL match was a Pirc Defense. For the last thirty years I have used the Pirc as my primary answer to 1 e4. At the Wednesday Albany Club meeting a young man asked me what I thought about the Pirc during some skittles play, and David Finnerman asked a similar question of me after his game ended. Not needing too much persuasion to write about the Pirc, it seemed the Sells – Finnerman game would a convenient platform where what little I have learned about this opening could be presented.
Let me first say I am far from an expert on this opening. There excellent books on the market about the Pirc where you can find true expert opinions about this opening. The one work that made the subject most clear for me is Alburt’s and Chernin’s Pirc Alert! It is still in print I believe. If you want to use the Pirc this is a valuable resource for players up 2200.
There is one caveat that is true for Pirc Alert!, and it applies to every other opening book I have read: The conclusions and recommendations are on many points only opinions of the authors. In this case true they are GM’s, but you will see in the illustrative games some very good players may not always agree with the ideas. In today’s article we will touch on the different opinions about the 5th move for Black. These differences are not mine, rather it is in large part what other Grandmasters seem to believe based on their games. I tend to give greater weight to what a GM plays as opposed to what he writes.
Most of the illustrative games are the work of World Champions before, during or shortly after their reigns. There is not enough space even on a blog to exhaust the supply of interesting Pirc Defense games. My goal will be achieved if this article inspires some to dig into the databases and discover more of the possibilities of this opening.
The game trundled on for some more moves in Finnerman’s effort to win the game and tie the match. The extra effort was not rewarded and the draw agreed. White understood exactly what was required to hold the position. This was the last game to finish in the match. Both players gave their all in a game of significance for both teams.}
The Illustrative games below set out some of the critical issues in the Pirc Defense, Austrian Attack. Which choice to prefer: 5…, c5; or 5…, 0-0? If 5…, c5; what to do about 6 Bb5+, and 7 e5? When using the Pirc, players of the Black pieces should be aware of Seirawan’s innovation in the 5…, c5; line. For the players of the White pieces avoidance of Yasser’s forced draw requires a willingness explore really tough chess.
Game 1 – The future World Champion demonstrates 5…, 0-0; can give Black chances to win.
Game 2 – A couple of years before things did not work out quite so well for him.
Game 3 – Using 5…, 0-0; was not confined to just Anand.
Game 4 – Seirawan shook up things in the Pirc when he sprung his innovation on the world. After Yasser demonstrated it, all was obvious. Beforehand that was not so.
Game 5 – Now we are getting into an area where theory gets deep. Playing here without familiarity with theory is very difficult’
Game 6 – A little history. Fischer’s Pirc was a big surprise to us onlookers in the 1972 match with Spassky
Game 7 – Spassky’s subsequent use of the Pirc against a tough opponent, along with the Fischer game started me thinking about this opening. I thought my then usual French Defense to 1. e4, was too predictable. My classical bias was strong, and it took another six or seven years before I switched.
Game 8 – The Pirc continues to appear in the games of the best players. Here is an example from not so long ago:
After that lengthy trip through the above collection of Pirc Defenses, Austrian Attacks how can it be summed up? Both 5…, 0-0; and 5…, c5; have their adherents at the highest levels of chess. With 5…, c5; Black aims for a transposition into a decent position from the Dragon Sicilian. If you mean to use 5…, c5; booking up on the Dragon-type middle games is time well spent. If you want to use 5…, 0-0; required is a certain amount of steely determination to wait for your chance to strike back in the center as David did in this game.
In the 5…, c5; line there are critical variations involving 6 Bb5+, and 7 e5. These are most difficult to workout over the board as I found in my own games. The difficulty seems to be because of a need to calculate precisely in positions that are rather different from what is seen in other more classical openings. Very accurate calculation in unusual positions is demanding.
To illustrate this point: A researcher, a Russian I believe, did an experiment with titled chess players. They were given a very brief look at two sets of chess positions; one set was of positions culled from actual games, the other were constructed positions with the pieces randomly placed. The subjects were then tested to see how accurate was their recall of the test positions. The positions from actual games were recalled in far greater accuracy than were the random positions. This experiment confirms that one of skills good players have is pattern recognition. The researcher further concluded that good players compare the position before them to the stock of positions from their experience and likely reach decisions, in part at least, through the comparison: this move worked elsewhere before, let’s see if it will work here?
When a Pirc game goes off into the rather un-classical situations of the 5…, c5 6 Bb5+ Bd7 7 e5 Ng4 8 e6, line, the room for error expands. With the Pirc not being a first choice opening for most, and the Austrian Attack positions rarer since it is not White’s only option, many, if not most players, do not have an extensive store of previous positions to draw upon. Right from the beginning of the game, Black, if he is well prepared, welcomes the incisive response of the Austrian. Black can play for a win. That is not something the more classical openings offer.
When 5…, 0-0; is Black’s choice the positions are not quite so strange. At a casual glance it often appears White is very dominant in the center. Black then needs to be very alert to find the right moment to hit back in the center. Iron nerve and self-confidence are essential for Black not to lose heart
As theory has advanced over the years White has developed and improved many alternatives to the Austrian: 4 Nf3, 4 f3, 4 Bg5, and so on. By not taking up so wide a center with 4 f4, White can keep the game more usual looking and avoid the fantasy Black seeks. If Black means to use the Pirc, he has to be ready to face these options also.
I very rarely dare to comment on games by Grandmasters. Even with the aid of mighty Rybka, Grandmasters know so much more chess than I do it seems presumptuous to say much about their games. Today’s game is a place where I maybe can get away with an exception to that rule. Continue reading “A Theoretical Article about the Benoni”